Agricultural Subsidies
Location: Oxford, UK
Date: 8 - 9 June, 2004
Context: Trade liberalization is the most effective international means to attack poverty. Agricultural gains represent 40 percent of gains from trade liberalization for the developing world. The current stalemate is due to the inability of trade negotiators to agree on the necessary trade-offs to make the round a genuine development round, in large part because of the deadlock in agriculture. A G20 at Leaders Level could help end the stalemate. G20 leaders could lift the overall framework out of the hands of trade-negotiators. The leaders-level agreement, characterized as ?trading away poverty?, could rewrite the briefs for negotiators and thereby create the conditions for a fair deal.
Papers
| Luisa Bernal | The Way Forward in Agriculture | |
| Panos Konandreas | Tariff Negotiations in Agriculture: A Dynamic Blended Formula | |
| Patrick A. Messerlin | Forging a Deal on Agricultural Trade Reform | |
| Sophia Murphy | Agricultural Trade: Time for a New Framework | |
| Dominiques Njinkeu and Francis Mangeni | A development-focused Agricultural Deal | |
| John M. Weekes | A Possible Scenario for a Deal on Agricultural Trade Reform |
Backgrounders
| Amrita Narlikar | The World Trade Organization: A Case for G20 Action on Institutional Reform | |
| Kevin Watkins | WTO Negotiations on Agriculture: Problems and Ways Ahead | |
| Carolyn Deere | Capacity Building and Policy Coherence: A Role for a Leaders’ Level G20? | |
| Dr. Ngaire Woods, Director - The Global Economic Governance Programme, Oxford University | Agricultural Subsidies & the WTO |



